The belief in the Finality of Prophethood is one of the most important pillars of Islamic faith. Every Muslim, regardless of school of thought, holds a deep, unshakable conviction that Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) is the final Prophet sent by Allah. This belief is rooted in the Qur’an, the authentic Sunnah, and the consensus of scholars over 1400 years. Any claim of prophethood after him stands in direct contradiction to Islamic doctrine. This forms the foundation of why mainstream Muslims strongly reject the claims of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani.

Muslims take matters of faith seriously. When a person claims a position as sacred and final as prophethood, the Muslim community naturally examines that claim according to Qur’anic teachings and Sunnah. Based on this examination, Muslims have historically and consistently concluded that the claim of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad contradicts the basic principles of Islam.

For readers seeking detailed analysis, a comprehensive resource can be found on Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani, where Islamic scholars explain why his claim is considered invalid from a purely theological perspective.

The Qur’anic Foundation: Khatam-an-Nabiyyin

Allah says in Surah Al-Ahzab, verse 40:

“Muhammad is not the father of any of your men, but he is the Messenger of Allah and the Seal of the Prophets.”

This verse has been understood for centuries to mean:

• No prophet will come after Muhammad (peace be upon him)

• Prophethood reaches completion and closure with him

• Revelation in the form of new laws or new scripture ended with him

Classical scholars—including Imam al-Qurtubi, Ibn Kathir, Imam Nawawi, Imam Tahawi, and many others—state unanimously that “Seal of the Prophets” means final, last, no more prophets after him.

Because of this, Muslims view any later claim of prophethood as a contradiction of the Qur’an.

Consensus (Ijma’) of 1400 Years

One of the strongest principles in Islamic scholarship is Ijma’, or consensus.
Every major Muslim scholar across every school of thought—Hanafi, Shafi’i, Maliki, Hanbali, Athari, Sufi, Zahiri—agrees:

• Prophethood ended with Muhammad (peace be upon him)

• Anyone claiming prophethood after him is not truthful

• Such a claim exits the bounds of orthodox Islamic belief

This consensus is overwhelming, uninterrupted, and universal.

Because Mirza Ghulam Ahmad declared himself a prophet in different forms (messianic, subordinate, reformer, or literal), Muslims could not accept such a declaration.

Why Muslims Reject Mirza Ghulam Ahmad’s Claims

Muslims do not reject Mirza Ghulam Ahmad out of personal hostility. The rejection is based on:

1. His claim violates the Qur’an

The Qur’an clearly states that prophethood ended with the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him).
Any new claim contradicts a direct command of Allah.

2. Prophethood is not open to reinterpretation

Some argue that Mirza Ghulam Ahmad claimed ‘non-legislative’ or ‘minor’ prophethood.
Islamic scholarship rejects this distinction because:

• The Prophet (peace be upon him) said “There will be no prophet after me.”

• He did not differentiate between types of prophets.

• Anything called “prophethood” after him is invalid.

3. Authentic hadith support finality

Sahih Muslim, Sahih Bukhari, Tirmidhi, and numerous narrations confirm:

“I am the last prophet; there is no prophet after me.”

There is no room for linguistic or metaphorical reinterpretation.

4. The Ummah’s unity depends on finality

If multiple figures claim prophethood after Muhammad (peace be upon him), Islam would fracture endlessly.
To prevent this, Allah made finality a non-negotiable part of faith.

5. Historical predictions and failed prophecies

Scholars have documented several failed predictions attributed to Mirza Ghulam Ahmad.
In Islam, an unfulfilled prophecy invalidates the claimant.

Muslims oppose his claim based on doctrine, not personal animosity.

Respecting Differences Without Compromising Faith

Islam teaches good manners and justice even toward those who differ in belief.
Muslims are taught:

• not to disrespect individuals,

• not to insult,

• not to mock,

• not to harm any community.

Yet at the same time, they are commanded to protect the purity of Islamic doctrine.

Rejecting a theological claim does not require hatred toward individuals; it requires clarity and firmness toward false theological claims.

Muslims maintain respect for all people but stand firm against any false claim of prophethood.

Why Muslims Consider the Final Prophet a Sacred Boundary

The Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) is not only the final messenger; he is the completion of prophethood.

Accepting him as the last prophet is:

• part of the shahada

• part of Aqeedah Tahawiyyah

• part of classical Sunni and Shia teachings

• part of Islamic identity

• a divine command from Allah

This boundary protects the Ummah from deviation.
Muslims, therefore, reject Mirza Ghulam Ahmad’s claims because accepting them would mean:

• rejecting Qur’anic verses

• ignoring authentic hadith

• dismissing 1400 years of scholarship

For Muslims, this is not acceptable.

Conclusion

Muslims do not oppose Mirza Ghulam Ahmad out of personal dislike.
They reject his claim because it opposes the Qur’an, contradicts Hadith, and breaks the long-standing consensus of the Ummah.

Islam holds the Finality of Prophethood as a core, sacred belief, and Muslims have the full right to defend their faith and maintain its purity.

For a fuller analysis rooted in Islamic sources, readers can visit Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani to understand why mainstream Muslims never accepted his claim.